data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76299/7629933d463fa1bd0bab4217e49b7b1d95722294" alt=""
10- The state of mineralisation and weight point to this sub fossil being of a considerable age.
There are no signs of attention from Humans, predators , scavengers, or water ware.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7504/f7504b68c7f40d7e09a1be40510993ef9f3d9d05" alt=""
11- 14 This scapula looks to be Bos but ime not totally sure, it could be from a large Cervid.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d216/0d21630d60a5408895f2307451aec226f2e2efdb" alt=""
12
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6948/e694861d6066e3a4992555744c386735195de5e7" alt=""
13
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75447/754472b8344ccb3502d79ccd65d8f1431e431dd6" alt=""
14
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5918/b59183eb5978f8ab01d921de986bf6dbf2cdc38c" alt=""
15 - 18 This very large scapula has the top ridge missing, it was found in the same area as the scapula shown in images 1 - 10 yet is from a slightly smaller Bos but again I believe it to be from Bos Premigenius ( Auroch ) .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51fe7/51fe7cee86bec2b6399ed89505c840a0754decec" alt=""
16
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/397f7/397f75fb983b60764b7d3650f80acec2905072f2" alt=""
17
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9efea/9efea26dbe82519bda8771f13651144eaeb3b899" alt=""
18 Again i must stress there is no evidence of attention from man predators or scavengers on any of these sub fossils.